Skip to content
ABS Nexora Blogs · Insights & news
Analytics2026-10-186 min read

Top self-citing researchers in the ABS Nexora Directory (2026)

Directory self-citation author rankings place several scholars near 100% self_citation_pct. Among those with ≥500 total citations, examples include Boonpok (~98.1%, 1,451 cites) and Efetov (~96.7%, 970 cites).

Who has the highest self-citation share in the Directory?

Direct answer: ABS Nexora ranks researchers by native field self_citation_pct (Stanford–Ioannidis self%). In the 2026 single-year world leaderboard, the top of the list includes scholars at or near 100.00% self-citation share — often with modest total citation counts. Filtering to researchers with ≥500 total citations (all), high self-cite examples include Boonpok, Chawalit (~98.07%, 1,451 cites) and Efetov, Konstantin A. (~96.70%, 970 cites).

High self-citation % is a share metric, not proof of impact — always open the profile and compare all-citations vs excluding-self (ns) indicators.

World leaderboard examples (by self_citation_pct)

ResearcherCountrySelf-citation %Total citations (all)
Gildenkov, M. YuRUS100.00%63
Yamazaki, TaichiJPN100.00%124
Malekian, FarhadSWE98.18%110
Boonpok, ChawalitTHA98.07%1,451
Shamolin, Maxim V.RUS97.24%145
Perevaryukha, A. YuRUS97.08%171
Efetov, Konstantin A.UKR96.70%970
El-Hadidy, Mohamed Abd AllahEGY96.40%250
McGee, Robert W.USA91.04%614
Kurhade, Anant SidhappaIND92.01%964

High self-cite share with ≥500 total citations

These researchers still appear near the top of the self-citation ranking but are not low-cite edge cases:

ResearcherCountrySelf-citation %Total citations (all)
Boonpok, ChawalitTHA98.07%1,451
Efetov, Konstantin A.UKR96.70%970
Kurhade, Anant SidhappaIND92.01%964
McGee, Robert W.USA91.04%614
Waware, Shital YashwantIND90.82%686
Mollaamin, FatemehTUR85.03%1,430
Naseer, T.PAK80.65%1,457
Selvakumar, P. S.IND79.89%1,870
Gaidai, OlegCHN75.04%1,739
Feng, HuijunCHN67.73%1,004

Worked example: all-citations vs excluding self-citations

For Boonpok, Chawalit in the leaderboard payload: self_citation_pct ≈ 98.07%, total_citations_all = 1,451, total_citations_ns = 28. The ns (no-self) citation total is far smaller than the all-citations total — exactly why Top 2% lists publish both views.

Country slices

  • United States top self-cite author in this pull: McGee, Robert W. (~91.04%, 614 cites). USA mean country self-cite remains low (~8.30%).
  • China examples include Guo, Guangbao (~92.31%) and higher-cite Gaidai, Oleg (~75.04%, 1,739 cites).

How to use this list responsibly

  1. Prefer profiles over screenshots of a single percentage.
  2. Pair self-cite % with rank_ns / citations_ns (excluding self-citations).
  3. Compare peers in the same subfield, not across unrelated disciplines.
  4. Read: Self-citations vs total citations and How to interpret self-citation stats.

Explore

FAQ

Who is #1 by self-citation %? In this 2026 single-year world pull, Gildenkov, M. Yu and Yamazaki, Taichi both show 100.00% self_citation_pct (with 63 and 124 total citations respectively).

Who are notable high-cite, high self-cite examples? Boonpok (~98.07%, 1,451 cites) and Efetov (~96.70%, 970 cites) are clear Directory examples with ≥500 citations.

Does 100% self-citation mean zero external impact? It means the indicator’s self-citation share is total for that row; check total_citations_ns and field ranks on the profile before drawing conclusions.

Can I filter by country? Yes — analytics exposes scoped author lists (e.g. USA / China) via the self-citation authors API used by the Directory UI.

Where is the live ranking? Open Analytics self-citation leaderboards, or call /api/analytics/self-citation/authors.